<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Current Employment &#187; Immigration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://currentemployment.net/category/hr-issues/immigration-hr-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://currentemployment.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>E-Verify Regulation Postponed, Possibly Tabled</title>
		<link>http://currentemployment.net/2009/01/e-verify-regulation-postponed-possibly-tabled/</link>
		<comments>http://currentemployment.net/2009/01/e-verify-regulation-postponed-possibly-tabled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Eavenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HR Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Chamber of Commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://currentemployment.net/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system, which checks the employment eligibility of workers against U.S.  immigration records, was set to go into effect Jan. 15.  

But staring at a pending lawsuit and general anger from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, DHS cut a deal with the Chamber yesterday, delaying the system's implimentation until February 20.  The change in timing will put the regulation, subject to an executive order, on President-elect Obama's table after he takes office.  

The business community is hoping that might mean the end of the issue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today was supposed to be a very bad day for federal contractors.  </p>
<p>The Department of Homeland Security&#8217;s E-Verify system, which checks the employment eligibility of workers against U.S.  immigration records, was set to go into effect Jan. 15.  </p>
<p>But staring at a pending lawsuit and general anger from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, DHS cut a deal with the Chamber yesterday, delaying the system&#8217;s implimentation until February 20.</p>
<p>The Chamber sued DHS over E-Verify, alleging that the government is exceeding its authority by mandating implimentation of the system for companies receiving over $100,000 in federal contracts.  </p>
<p>The sides obviously disagree on the purpose of the delay, however.  DHS sees it as merely giving the litigation process a chance to work.  <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/extraedge/washingtonbureau/archive/2009/01/12/bureau1.html" target="_blank">From the Washington Business Journal</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>DHS spokesman Russ Knocke said &#8230; that &#8220;the brief pause in implementation&#8221; will not change the rule, &#8220;which will remain legally final and binding.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This pause merely allows litigants the opportunity to make their case before a judge, and prevents parties opposed to the rule from additional stalling through litigation,&#8221; Knocke said. &#8220;We are confident that their arguments will not prevail.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>But the Chamber clearly has bigger ambitions than just making its case before a judge.  Its hope is that the delay, which stretches the implimentation beyond Barack Obama&#8217;s inauguration day, will give the new President a chance to end the mandate altogether.  <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/extraedge/washingtonbureau/archive/2009/01/12/bureau1.html" target="_blank">Again, from the WBJ article</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Robin Conrad, executive vice president of the National Chamber Litigation Center, said the delay in the rule&#8217;s effective date will give the new Obama administration &#8220;an opportunity to re-evaluate the efficacy of the policy.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We hope the incoming administration recognizes that the last thing American businesses need during these difficult economic times is more bureaucracy and higher compliance costs,&#8221; Conrad said.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Re-evaluate the efficacy of the policy&#8221;  is, of course, business-speak for &#8220;kill it&#8221;.</p>
<p>It seems likely that the Chamber will win this round.  The mandate is costly (hundreds of millions in expenses for businesses, by some estimates), and an easy appeasement for a new administration that will be pushing hard for many bills to which the Chamber is staunchly opposed.  Plus, it&#8217;s not doing away with E-Verify altogether.  The system remains available for businesses on a voluntary basis.  100,000 or so companies already use the program.</p>
<p>Besides, the idea that anything of consequence will happen by February in a lawsuit filed in late December makes me think that not even DHS believes the delay is meant to let the litigation process work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://currentemployment.net/2009/01/e-verify-regulation-postponed-possibly-tabled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

